|
|
| Well
remembering the rejoicing in Cornwall over the passing of the Reform
Bill in 1832, and taking part, as I did, in promoting the Reform Bill
of 1867, it might be expected that, like hundreds of others, I should
be smitten with a desire to get into the new reformed Parliament.
I received, and accepted, an invitation to contest Truro in 1868,
when the chances were decidedly against me. The character and colour
of my political creed at the time may be seen from the following extract
from my address :- |
 |
"
I would repeal the rate-paying clauses of the last Reform Bill; I
would place the means of education within the reach of every child
in the Kingdom; I am in favour of the ballot and an equalised distribution
of Parliamentary constituencies ; I would insist on a wise economy
in every department of the State; I would endeavour to apply the teachings
of Cobden, and cultivate a policy of non-intervention, and, wherever
possible, substitute arbitration for war in the settlement of national
disputes ; I would abolish the purchase system in the army; I would
put an end to the game laws; I would make the privileges of our national
universities accessible to men of every religious creed; I would do
my best to make the colonies self-supporting; I would abolish death
punishments; and I would vote for an equalisation of the poor law
and a more useful administration of charitable endowments. |
| There
are other social questions which would claim my attention, such as
improved dwellings for the working classes, the institution of courts
of arbitration for the protection of the funds of all legally constituted
trade societies, and the cultivation of waste lands and revision of
the licensing system." My address, written thirty-seven years
ago, carried too much reform sail to captivate a majority of Truro
electors. Besides, Truro, in 1868, returned two members, and every
voter had two votes, and I had to sustain a contest single-handed
against the old members, both connected with powerful county families-one
a Conservative, and the other a Liberal-who offered themselves for
re-election, and who united their forces to secure my defeat. The
main points of my address carry with them now a flavour of ancient
history, as most of them have since been embodied in legislation.
Sir F. M. Williams, my chief opponent, left me between three and four
hundred votes below him at the poll. His political creed was locally
successful then; mine, in the main, has been nationally triumphant
since. |
|
|
|